 |
| Jo Nova |
The husband and wife denier team of
Jo Nova and
Dave Evans are superstars of the climate denying demi-world, not just in their native Australia but everywhere in the world where the pure
Anglo Saxon tongue is still celebrated.
Dave is as blunt as
Galileo Movement manager
Malcolm Roberts : climate change is a
conspiracy put up by Jewish banking families like the
Rothschilds.
Dear
Jo, the distaff denier, is of the gentler sex and settles on just blaming it on the
banksters (ethnicity and religion of which is left undefined) and upon "fiat" money, that brand of money made famous by
Ron Paul and his ilk.
Its an intellectual and emotional tussle as old as the modern banking system.
The fight is between those citizens who see paper money as merely a more compact versions of regular legal contracts such as their own
mortgage and those who see paper money as
flim-flamery and financial alchemy : "
fiat money".
Most of us intuitively sense that the words on the back of old money stating "X will pay bearer $20 in gold on demand" was some sort of
contract between the issuer of the note and anyone who accepted it.
As if when an Albanian teenager
freely offered to buy your copy of the first Beatles album in Albanian currency at the official artificially high government-set exchange rate, you were equally
free to decline to accept her offer but counter-offer the suggestion she pay you $10 in good old American greenbacks
instead.
Yes the Albanian government did issue its bank notes and set an "official" exchange rate by "fiat", but most of us can see we are equally free to reject the fiat and refuse to do business on those terms.
We sense that it takes two to have a meeting of minds and to form a contract: an Albanian and you.
But a
significant percentage of us, all throughout history, and in every nation, has refused to see money that way.
They represent, even in peaceful and prosperous times, about
15% of the voting population.
The fact that they are paranoid and suspicious about banks and money is really incidental : they are
paranoid and suspicious about nearly everything and everyone . Always have been, always will be.
Two paranoias for the price of one : climate change and banksters
The same 15% is also highly suspicious about reports of global warming and man-made climate change, so it was only a matter of time before they happily put two of their favourite paranoias together.
True they could have blamed
immigrants, refugees, blacks, aboriginals or homo-sex-uals for climate change but frankly this seemed , well, too global for these people to pull off .
"Let's blame stick to blaming them for non-white collar crime and rising drug use in schools."
No, only one tiny minority ethnic group has traditionally been regarded as having the moxie to pull this sort of global conspiracy off : Jews. In particular ,
Jewish banking families.
International banking firms are actually quite new; we have all seen those American movies where every small town has its own banker, who owns and operates a tiny one branch bank - by law.
Voters never wanted or trusted big banks and tried hard to limit their operation to one tiny geography or perhaps just one part of the overall banking industry.
But today some giant banks can and do operate all over the world : truly international. But unfortunately these various big banks aren't owned by any
one somebody : rather a
few million people own their shares : directly or through pension or mutual funds.
Bit hard to keep secret a plot by three million shareholders who don't know each other from Adam.
But in the old days, families of bankers did neatly sidestep the rules that restricted banks to one nation or one activity.
Brother X in Germany did investment banking inside Germany, his cousin Y did the same in England while uncle Z did retail banking in Australia and so on.
And yes, many of these real-life
closely-knit banking families were Jewish.
But they weren't in fact tremendously powerful, partly because there was widespread suspicion of them, both as Jews and as international bankers .
The truly powerful cabals in the pre-war era were world-wide industrial
cartels run by
WASPS , but even there there were always cartel members tempted to go off the range, so to speak.
The paranoid 15%, a competitive and entrepreneurial lot, can't get along with each other but somehow they can't accept that other people at least as competitive and as entrepreneurial as themselves, mightn't stay united in a cabal for very long either.
Climate change acceptors should never be reduced to discussing or debating science with these
15 percenters , they should be dissecting the
deniers' free-floating paranoia instead .
Turn over
their stones and you'll find an endless list of objects for their year-round "
HATE WEEK" : climate change is but one of many......
So clearly, she gave The Galileo Movement and its anti-semites her 110%, as they say in SportsJockLand.
Wait ! There's more !!!!
Fred Singer and Richard Lindzen , both of whose relatives suffered and died under Hitler's extermination of Europe's Jews, also are listed as scientific advisors to The Galileo Movement.
Perhaps you are right, "Confused from Eastbourne", those Rothschilds must have done something spectacular to get these three Jews so dead set against them and acting like there is some truth to Henry Ford's old "Protocols of the Zionist Elders" world conspiracy talk after all.
It is all a highly interesting story, "Confused from Eastbourne", but don't expect to see it in any mainstream newspaper.
All of them have given those Galileo scientific advisors wide credibility by quoting them as "scientific experts" on the other side of the 97% scientific consensus on global warming, in a misguided excuse at "objectivity".
Exposing their so called experts as supporting anti-semitic conspiracy theories would only make these newspapers appear to be fools.
And what would be the point of that ?
Their readers, better than anyone else, already knew that --- years ago.
Sorry I can't be anymore hopeful,
yours sincerely,
M. R. Marshall