Logically, the only thing worth examining is the unexamined assumptions that we all hold in common
The only real test of a scientific hypothesis is to have it reviewed by non-peers , for they will probably not share the underlying 'unexamined assumptions' that form the outer limits of whatever space a potentially new scientific theory can inhabit in a particular discipline.
By its very definition, peer review always fails, must fail, any truly ground-breaking scientific effort.
